On Saturday my twitter feed erupted. Multiple shots and vids from the fiasco at Mt Albert where Keli Jay aka Posie Parker was mobbed by a furious crowd of blood lusting beings, a little like some terrifying mass rape or a witch burning lynching. Thankfully she made it out alive- that bad.
The traffic must have been intense, my computer literally spat at me, twice, before I was inclined to log out of twitter and recoil in shocked horror. All reports in the msm, as well as others, labelled her as "anti-trans". This brought the ire of the woke machine into full throttle, driving offended trans people to scream blue murder and the relative politicians and police into an apoplexy of denial.
As Kelli Jay points out, she is pro-woman, not anti-trans but pro-woman. There is a big difference, whether you like it or not. One can be pro-jew without being anti-zionist. The differences are subtle but there is no automatic correlation, to suggest so is intellectual arrogance, lazy thinking and assumptive.
So, what algorithm drives the divisive and dividing culture wars? The disparity of viewpoints, chopped up like a raw fish, is generally exacerbated by the nudges and suggestions in respect of data gathered, almost interminably, by the revenue harvesting of the big machine. Do you like onions? If so, you will definitely be targeted with ads for, I dunno, dried onions, fresh onions, onion recipes and so forth. Do you buy designer shoes, or handbags? Well here come the ads from upmarket looking sites. Anyway, if your shoes, or onions, or high tech surveillance gear or whatever become part of the data gathered by machine, you may be assured this will be reflected in the offerings for your daily consumption by the way of the algorithm (notice I didn't say 'rest assured', as there is no rest for the wicked or the good in generate-the-dollar land).
So Kelli Jay is pro-woman and I ask, what mad twist of the plot has turned on all the vicious hatefulness of the hoi poloi down here, the unspeakable lack of courtesy from the government, media and most especially the police, how do we come to have the most misogynistic, foul and vulgar face to show the world? In the reality that we are not kind, we are not empathetic at all. We are in fact enablers of creepy pedophiles and damaging brain washing by way of bungled neurotechnology and fast-eddie substitutions. We allow hypnotics into schools and promote some airy fairy inclusiveness which is only inclusive of those who push the agenda. Those who smell money and those who have no qualms about selling violence & deceit as sport or religion, all funded by the taxpayer- you.
I personally see that government is currently run with the assistance of 1) many 'consultants', lobbyists, bankers, realestate sales personae.. 2) systems engineers, system operators, system checkers and firewall tech (I hope) .. 3) software merchants - which bring us to the use of A.I. Artificial Intelligence.
How about some of the thoughts of the brilliant Jaron Lanier: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/mar/23/tech-guru-jaron-lanier-the-danger-isnt-that-ai-destroys-us-its-that-it-drives-us-insane ...although he is slightly xenophobic about tik-tok, his feet on the ground gestalt is a helpful read. There is a certain come and go, to and fro pattern to tech innovation. If something is brand new, shiny and glittery be sure to avert your eyes until the hype has subsided- it may be in part helpful to humanity but when I say in part, how big or small a part is a question of balance.
No comments:
Post a Comment